[C++-sig] Just about to release

[Greg Hawkins]

Sure,

Should minor bits like this go to the list or to you or Joel directly? I guess the list is best so you don't get loads of duplicates...

Another one, for instance:

-------

first code example in boost/libs/python/doc/tutorial/doc/basic_interface.html

the 'y' doesn't correspond to the 'f' in the subsequent cpp example. One of them needs fixing.

    def f(x, f):
         if (y == 'foo'):  <<< this y should be f 
             x[3:7] = 'bar'
         else:
             x.items += f(3, x)
         return x

    def getfunc():
       return f;

-----------

best,
Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: David Abrahams [mailto:dave at boost-consulting.com]
Sent: 09 October 2002 20:33
To: c++-sig at python.org
Subject: Re: [C++-sig] Just about to release


"Greg Hawkins" <Greg.Hawkins at softwire.co.uk> writes:

> Dave,
> 
> I think there's a small glitch in the
> boost/libs/python/doc/tutorial/doc/call_policies.html.
> 
> Informs Boost.Python that the lifetime of the argument indicated by
> ward (i.e. the 2nd argument: Z* z) is dependent on the lifetime of the
> argument indicated by custodian (i.e. the 1st argument: Z* z).
> 
> should be
> 
> Informs Boost.Python that the lifetime of the argument indicated by
> ward (i.e. the 2nd argument: Z* z) is dependent on the lifetime of the
> argument indicated by custodian (i.e. the 1st argument: Y& y).

Thanks, Greg. I'm going to ask Joel to make the appropriate patches
when he gets done sleeping (it's 3AM where he is).

-Dave


-- 
           David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave at boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com


_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig at python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig