Suggestion for a "data" object syntax

[Mikhail V]

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:15 AM, Mikhail V <mikhailwas at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Mikhail V <mikhailwas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Right? Your issues with tabs aside, I think it is impossible to ignore the
>>>> the readability improvement. Not even speaking of how
>>>> many commas and bracket you need to type in the first case.
>>>
>>> That's incredibly subjective. Or else straight-up wrong, I'm not sure which.
>>
>> Just admit it, you try to troll me (or just pretend, I don't know).
>
> No, I am not trolling you.

I don't believe you.


> Neither of those examples is program code. You are asking for a
> syntactic change to a *programming language*. Everything you've said
> is fine for a non-code format. Nothing is applicable to a programming
> language.

Everything I said in previous mail was related to your claim that it's
Ok (or even better?) readable
with brackets and commas in a table than without them.
I was not even starting this terminology course.