[OT] Weaknesses of distro package managers - was Re: Python 2 to 3 conversion - embrace the pain

Mario Figueiredo marfig at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 10:59:01 EDT 2015


On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 02:40:26 -0700 (PDT), wxjmfauth at gmail.com wrote:
>
>Python 3.x is excellent.
>Probably, the best language to show a
>poor and buggy Unicode implementation
>(Character Encoding Model).
>
>When I think other computer languages or
>Unicode related tools are all doing wrong.
>That's terrible.
>

Ah. So you are on the Python 3 unicode support sucks bandwagon too?

Bet you guys have a whole lot of fun there. Rave parties, trashing,
getting mad at something. Sounds fun.

Over here, on the Python 3 unicode support is just fine bandwagon, we
aren't so lucky. Things are just going smoothly, so they don't let us
party. We spend most of our time writting applications that don't
crash at runtime on the user hands because Python 3 is not permissive
and does force us to write well-formed encoding protocols.

Many times I though jumping to your side. Like I said, it sounds more
fun. But really, wife and kids need to eat.



More information about the Python-list mailing list