'Lite' Databases (Re: sqlite3 and dates)

[memilanuk]

On 02/18/2015 08:36 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> memilanuk <memilanuk at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> They would need to be able to set up the application (and whatever
>> database) on their laptop or PC, wherever that may be, and spend their
>> time administering the event, not the database engine.
>
> So, the database will only be accessed by exactly one application, on
> exactly the same machine and storage as the application? If so, you
> don't need concurrency.
>
> Otherwise, your database needs concurrency; and the person installing
> the database will need to make a lot of decisions about the specific
> network environment and devices to be allowed to access the database.
>
> But is this what you mean by your requirements not being met by SQLite?
>

In the past I've been waffling back and forth between a desktop 
client/server setup, or a web-based interface with everything on one 
computer.  At this point I'm leaning toward the latter.

-- 
Shiny!  Let's be bad guys.

Reach me @ memilanuk (at) gmail dot com