PEPs should be included with the documentation download

[Aseem Bansal]

On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:25:44 PM UTC+5:30, rand... at fastmail.us wrote:
> I think, though, that if there's any useful information that can be
> obtained by reading accepted PEPs but not the documentation, or if
> things are explained less clearly than in the PEPs, that's a bug in the
> documentation, and should be remedied by adding to the documentation.

PEP8 is referenced a lot but only a very small portion is included in the documentation (in the tutorial). I am a Python newbie and there may be other PEPs usually referenced which I might not be aware about. 

Maybe add selected PEPs to the documentation? I agree that adding rejected PEPs is no good but there may be PEPs worthy of addition to the documentation.