Python 3.0

[Blubaugh, David A.]

Is there a logical reason why Python 3 is not backwards compatible?

David Blubaugh




 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Hart [mailto:goodwillhart at googlemail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 7:44 PM
To: Blubaugh, David A.
Subject: Re: scary thought for consideration

I don't know, it's in alpha now apparently and is not backwards
compatible.

Bill.

On 16/02/2008, Blubaugh, David A. <dblubaugh at belcan.com> wrote:
> When will Python 3 be available?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Hart [mailto:goodwillhart at googlemail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 7:03 PM
> To: Blubaugh, David A.
> Subject: Re: scary thought for consideration
>
> No it should be fine. Python 3 might cause problems.
>
> On 15/02/2008, Blubaugh, David A. <dblubaugh at belcan.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > To All,
> >
> >
> > I am wondering as far as the integration of MyHDL with Python 2.5, 
> > if there might be any potential version incompatibility issues?  
> > What I mean is will MyHDL not operate correctly, if it is executed 
> > with a Python 2.5 version not a Python 2.4? I will be testing to see

> > if this possibility is indeed true over the weekend.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David Blubaugh
> >
> > This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential 
> > and
> may
> > be privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named
above.
> If
> > you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or 
> > disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient,

> > any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

> > information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately 
> > by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After 
> > replying,
>
> > please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in
> correcting this error is appreciated.
> >
>