Secret Technology of THERMATE and 911 Crime

[stj911 at rock.com]

Thanks for this great link

On Jan 29, 7:27 pm, therm... at india.com wrote:
> Excellent Technology, and photos:
>
> http://stj911.org/jones/focus_on_goal.html
>
> As scientists, we look at the evidence, perform experiments, and apply
> the Scientific Method. The Greek method was to look at the evidence
> (superficially) and then try to explain things through logic and
> debate. The Greeks came up with various ideas in this way -- such as
> the geocentric theory in which the Earth was at the center of the
> universe, and all the stars and planets revolved around the earth.
> There were problems with this geocentric explanation, but Plato
> insisted that they must "save the hypothesis," and plausible
> explanations were found to account for anomalies -- i such as the
> retrograde motion of Mars. The philosophical debates and discussions
> were seemingly endless; the Dark Ages ensued.
>
> Along came Copernicus, Galileo, Newton and others with their
> experiments and observations, and the centuries-old Greek philosophy-
> based notions began to crumble. Galileo observed through a telescope
> that Jupiter had moons -- which revolved around Jupiter (not the
> Earth). He was threatened with torture if he did not recant his
> explanation (that the Earth was not at the center). He suffered house
> arrest but not torture as he quietly continued his experiments.
>
> In the lifetime of Newton, another experimenter who challenged the
> Greek approach, the scientific community worked out a system whereby
> scientific studies would be published after review by peers --
> qualified experts who could judge the quality of the research. Peer-
> reviewed technical journals arose and the peer-review process brought
> order to the relative chaos of work up to that time. Now experiments
> could be done and written up, then peer-reviewed and published. Peer-
> reviewed papers would draw the attention of others. To give an example
> of using the modern scientific method, a few colleagues and I are
> doing experiments and making observations in a scientific approach to
> what really happened at the World Trade Center. It is NOT merely a
> plausible explanation or debates about "possibilities" that we seek.
> Rather, having seen strong indications of foul play (see
> journalof911studies.com/Intersecting_facts_and_Theories_on_911.pdf )
> we are looking for hard evidence that would clearly verify an
> intentional crime beyond that of 19 hijackers. Ours is a forensic
> investigation, looking for a "smoking gun," which would then lead to a
> serious criminal investigation.
>
> I do not plan to make a career out of 9/11 research, and I am not
> making money from my investigations anyway. We need a formal, solid
> investigation of the 9/11 crimes committed, not a long-term study
> which endlessly debates all alternatives. I seek such solid evidence
> of an insider crime (beyond a reasonable doubt) that some of us will
> successfully demand a criminal investigation to confront key
> individuals who may have insider information -- within one year, if
> possible-- not many.
>
> So what evidence is likely to lead to such a criminal investigation?
>
> As identified in my talk at the University of California at Berkeley,
> there are four areas of 9/11 research that are so compelling that they
> may quickly lead to the goal of a solid investigation of 9/11 as an un-
> solved crime scene. These four areas are:
>
>    1. Fall time for WTC 7.
>    2. Fall times for the Towers.
>    3. Challenging the NIST report and Fact Sheet.
>    4. Evidence for use of Thermate reactions: What the WTC dust and
> solidified metal reveal.
>
>     * Please note that I do not focus only on the thermate-hypothesis,
> and I do research in all four areas above. Details are given in my
> talk, available here:www.911blogger.com/node/4622Also:
> video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9210704017463126290 )
>
> There are other lines that may compel a criminal investigation even
> before one of the above "hard science" research lines bears fruit:
>
>    5. Whistleblower statements -- including some individuals yet to
> emerge.
>    6. Who made the stock-market "put-option" trades on American and
> United Air Lines in the week before 9/11, indicating clear
> foreknowledge of the attacks coupled with greed?
>    7. The fact that the WTC dust was declared quite safe by the EPA/
> National Security Council when it fact scientists had proven it to be
> toxic, and the many people now clamoring for justice after being hurt
> and misled.
>    8. Calls for impeachment for war issues, e.g., from a state
> legislature or Congress, which scrutinizes the "Bush Doctrine," then
> opens the 9/11 question.
>    9. Pressure from 9/11 Family members, firemen and others for
> answers.
>   10. Direct appeals to Senators and Congresspersons -- who are
> charged with an oversight role. I initiated a Petition to this effect,
> demanding release of government-held information related to 9/11,
> which has since been signed by over 10,000 people. And I am in contact
> now with the Congressman from my state, seeking information and
> remedy.
>
> We have found evidence for thermates in the molten metal seen pouring
> from the South Tower minutes before its collapse, in the sulfidation
> and high-temperature corrosion of WTC steel, and in the residues found
> in the WTC dust. (Our sample originated from an apartment at 113 Cedar
> Street across from the WTC; chain of custody direct from the collector
> J. MacKinlay to Dr. Steven Jones). Many other details are given in the
> peer-reviewed paper here: journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/
> WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf . Other
> cutter-charges such as HMX and RDX may have also been used; but again,
> solid evidence for just one type of incendiary or explosive would be
> sufficient to compel a criminal investigation.
>
> Experiments continue, as shown in the photos below, and the results
> are consistent with thermate having been used in on 9/11/2001. We have
> a series of experiments planned, along with analyses. This research
> takes time.
> Above: In a fraction of a second, thermate cuts horizontally through a
> steel cup. Notice the high-temperature corrosion which occurred.
>
> Right: 1999: "Invention offers a thermite based apparatus and method
> for cutting target material [eg, steel] of a substantial thickness ...
> linear.. cutting action ..." A prototype has been used to cut through
> a steel I-beam.
>
> Below: Proof of Concept. The photograph below shows the one-hole proto-
> type device I built to produce a thermate-jet. Thermate is the red
> powder in the steel base. The prototype worked well, and the thermate-
> jet cut through a piece of structural steel in a fraction of a second.