Python and XML?

[Leonard J. Reder]

Stefan,

This package is looking better I tried the validation example, but it 
did not work
with 1.3beta so I grabbed 1.2.  If objectify works well I think this is a
great pick for anyone using xml.  Please post to me and the python announce
when 1.3 is released.

thanks,
Len
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Leonard J. Reder wrote:
>> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify.html
>> Looks like this stuff might do what I want.  Need to work through the
>> example.
>>
>> Are you the author?
> 
> Yup! :)
> 
> 
>> Why is this better then using gnossis?
> 
> lxml is faster and supports more XML standards. It's also more flexible in
> that it allows you to replace element classes at basically any granularity and
> thus add things to the Element API or even replace it as you see fit, without
> loosing the standard XML features. You can even do that at the C-level, in
> case you really need high-performance.
> 
> See the "extending lxml" section in the side menu at
> http://codespeak.net/lxml/dev/
> especially:
> http://codespeak.net/lxml/dev/element_classes.html
> 
> Stefan


-- 
===================================
Leonard J. Reder
Home office email : reder at ieee.org
Lab email         : reder at jpl.nasa.gov
Lab web page      : http://reder.jpl.nasa.gov
===================================