Evil, evil wxPython (and a glimmer of hope)

[Fuzzyman]

vivainio at gmail.com wrote:
> vivainio at gmail.com wrote:
> > Fuzzyman wrote:
> >
> > > The code is relatively simple - so it would be easy to maintain the
> > > parts you use if that was necessary. Certainly easier than duplicating
> > > it yourself from scratch. :-)
> >
> > Sounds convincing, I'll give it a shot after all.
>
> Ok, after brief eyeballing & experimenting, it appears that Wax is just
> what I was looking for. The code is simple, concise and trivially
> understandable, the level of wrapping seems about right, and examples
> are helpful.
>
> I'm glad I came whining about this in c.l.py instead of sucking it up
> or switching toolkits altogether. :-)

That's good news. I'm about to start using Wax on a couple of
small(ish) projects - so it's nice to know about other users.

All the best,

Fuzzyman
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml