Evil, evil wxPython (and a glimmer of hope)

[vivainio at gmail.com]

vivainio at gmail.com wrote:
> Fuzzyman wrote:
>
> > The code is relatively simple - so it would be easy to maintain the
> > parts you use if that was necessary. Certainly easier than duplicating
> > it yourself from scratch. :-)
>
> Sounds convincing, I'll give it a shot after all.

Ok, after brief eyeballing & experimenting, it appears that Wax is just
what I was looking for. The code is simple, concise and trivially
understandable, the level of wrapping seems about right, and examples
are helpful.

I'm glad I came whining about this in c.l.py instead of sucking it up
or switching toolkits altogether. :-)