merits of Lisp vs Python

[Rob Warnock]

Robert Uhl  <eadmund42 at NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
+---------------
| "JShrager at gmail.com" <JShrager at gmail.com> writes:
| > I have the code here (probably not the latest bcs I left the company
| > when it was acquired), let's do a little experiment, for what it's
| > worth: 89727 lines of Lisp code in 131 modules (lisp code files), 3306
| > "(defun" (by grep|wc), and 261 "(defmacro". [We did NOT use macros as
| > functions!] [Note that lines of code doesn't really matter in Lisp.]
| 
| Wow--my emacs install has 1,152,598 lines of code in 1,570 files,
| 29,244 defuns and 1,393 defmacros.
+---------------

Wow, indeed! The entire CMUCL-19c distribution is "only" 592081 lines
of source code in 1192 files, with 10699 DEFUNs and 1839 DEFMACROs.
I didn't realize CMUCL was so "small" compared to Emacs.  ;-}

[Of course, that doesn't include the number of DEFUNs & DEFMACROs
which are defined *by* macros, or the total of 2809 DEFINE-VOPs
in the various flavors of the compiler...]


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3 at rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607