Autocoding >Re: "Introduction to Ethics",

[Peter Hansen]

Timothy Rue wrote:
> 
> On 28-Jan-02 19:06:11 Neil Hodgson <nhodgson at bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >Kragen Sitaker:
> >> Can you explain what he sees VIC as, please?  I really want to know,
> >> but I can't figure it out.
>
> >   VIC appears to be what was called in the 80s a "software bus": systems
> 
> Interesting how so many people see it as something different.
> 
> Why do you suppose that is?

Maybe because the fellow promoting it is incapable of explaining
it clearly enough that we all have a decent picture of what it
really is?  Perhaps you can help with that problem?

> It is not an idea and it is not a language.

You like to say what it isn't, but what the frig _is_ it?!
And no, "it's the natural laws of the physical phenomenon..."
is *NOT* an adequate answer to *anyone* else reading this newsgroup.
Can't you see that?  

> And the irrational and illogical responces others have given, suggest that
> they know I'm right but can't quite get a handle on why.

Mostly we aren't saying we don't believe you; mostly we're saying
"_What_ are you talking about?"  You're priceless...