[Mailman-Developers] Reply-To munging considered *carefully*

[Barry Warsaw]

On Jan 07, 2010, at 03:56 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

>My advice, obviously, is that I don't think it will work as well as
>the existing software, but it wouldn't be the first time I've been
>very wrong, and I hope to live long enough to make many more
>mistakes. :-)  If he's right, it would be a good thing to have, and I
>think that's the place to look before adding more functionality to the
>RFC.
>
>Mailman could in theory offer it anyway, but I suspect that without an
>RFC sanction Barry and Mark would shy away from it.

Indeed.  TBH, I don't think adding more knobs to Mailman here is going to make
life any better for users.

-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/attachments/20100108/fe76c05a/attachment.pgp>