[Mailman-Developers] On-topic-ness for -users and -dev

Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Dec 17 18:45:45 CET 2005


>>>>> "JC" == JC Dill <lists05 at equinephotoart.com> writes:

    JC> The posts we are hoping to keep OFF of -dev and ON -users are
    JC> the posts by users who are having what they believe are
    JC> "complicated" use problems and they want "advanced support"

[...]

    JC> As long as the topic brought here is about *how* to develop a
    JC> new feature, I believe it's on-topic for -dev.

+1.  And good job of presenting, at that.  FAQ material?

    JC> [1] Does it belong in the headers, the footer, the body?
    JC> Should it be a configuration option to place it in one or more
    JC> of these locations? What happens when the button (or link) is
    JC> clicked?  What if non-spam is reported?  What about RFCs?
    JC> Etc.

Niggle: these questions are appropriate for -developers, but should
also be polled on -users.

-- 
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.


More information about the Mailman-Developers mailing list