March 2016 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Mar 3 05:01:30 EST 2016
Ending: Wed Mar 30 01:28:55 EDT 2016
Messages: 46

• [SciPy-Dev] "invalid" matrices in signaltools.py   G Young
• [SciPy-Dev] "invalid" matrices in signaltools.py   Sebastian Berg
• [SciPy-Dev] Fwd: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?   Evgeni Burovski
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Matthew Brett
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Ralf Gommers
• [SciPy-Dev] Gaussian Process hyperparameter tuning   Jan-Samuel Wagner
• [SciPy-Dev] Gaussian Process hyperparameter tuning   Daπid
• [SciPy-Dev] Gaussian Process hyperparameter tuning   Gael Varoquaux
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Matthew Brett
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Charles R Harris
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Charles R Harris
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Matthew Brett
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Matthew Brett
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Charles R Harris
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   josef.pktd at gmail.com
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Charles R Harris
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Charles R Harris
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Matthew Brett
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Olivier Grisel
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Matthew Brett
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Matthew Brett
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   josef.pktd at gmail.com
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Matthew Brett
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   josef.pktd at gmail.com
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   josef.pktd at gmail.com
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Matthew Brett
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   josef.pktd at gmail.com
• [SciPy-Dev] Numpy 1.11.0rc2 released.   Charles R Harris
• [SciPy-Dev] Slight change in lstsq accuracy for 0.17 - expected?   Olivier Grisel
• [SciPy-Dev] minimize reporting successful but not searching (with default method)   David Mikolas
• [SciPy-Dev] minimize reporting successful but not searching (with default method)   Pauli Virtanen
• [SciPy-Dev] minimize reporting successful but not searching (with default method)   Andrew Nelson
• [SciPy-Dev] minimize reporting successful but not searching (with default method)   David Mikolas
• [SciPy-Dev] minimize reporting successful but not searching (with default method)   David Mikolas
• [SciPy-Dev] Numpy 1.11.0 released   Charles R Harris
• [SciPy-Dev] Numpy 1.11.0 released   Evgeni Burovski
• [SciPy-Dev] RFC: sparse DOK array   Evgeni Burovski
• [SciPy-Dev] RFC: sparse DOK array   Stephan Hoyer
• [SciPy-Dev] RFC: sparse DOK array   Evgeni Burovski
• [SciPy-Dev] RFC: sparse DOK array   CJ Carey
• [SciPy-Dev] RFC: sparse DOK array   Evgeni Burovski
• [SciPy-Dev] RFC: sparse DOK array   Evgeni Burovski
• [SciPy-Dev] ANN: LAST CALL for SciPy (Scientific Python) 2016 Conference Talk / Poster Proposals - Due Friday 4/1   Courtenay Godshall (Enthought)
• [SciPy-Dev] RFC: sparse DOK array   CJ Carey
• [SciPy-Dev] Blog-post that explains what Blaze actually is and where Pluribus project now lives.   Travis Oliphant
• [SciPy-Dev] RFC: sparse DOK array   Nathaniel Smith

Last message date: Wed Mar 30 01:28:55 EDT 2016
Archived on: Fri Mar 24 01:17:53 EDT 2017

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...