[SciPy-dev] [SciPy-User] SciPy Foundation

David Goldsmith d_l_goldsmith at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 31 16:13:26 EDT 2009


Understood and agreed, but is your point that since code maintenance and generation would fall under the category of "capital," not "operations," consequently our default assumption as outsiders should be that they do not invest in it (except when "operations" necessitate)?

DG

--- On Fri, 7/31/09, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [SciPy-dev] [SciPy-User] SciPy Foundation
> To: "SciPy Developers List" <scipy-dev at scipy.org>
> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 12:59 PM
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:37 PM,
> David Goldsmith <d_l_goldsmith at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Interesting...  Now I'm curious to know how many
> others thought Enthought employees were paid to "keep
> the code covered"?
> 
> 
> I always figured they had to scramble to pay the bills.
> Making a small company go isn't easy-peasy.
> 
> Chuck 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scipy-dev mailing list
> Scipy-dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
> 


      



More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list