[SciPy-dev] License review / weave bsd-ification

[David Cournapeau]

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Benny Malengier
<benny.malengier at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with you.
> I just mean, if the license issue can be resolved, weave is a worthwhile
> part to have inside of scipy.

Sure. I mentioned scikits because one of the reason it exists in the
first place is licensing issues. It looks like if someone is willing
to port the newer random code to blitz template mechanism, the license
issue can be solved.

cheers,

David