[SciPy-dev] The future of the scipy.sandbox and a reminder of upcoming doc-day

[Matthieu Brucher]

>
> > I'd like to see arpack in the sparse folder (?) very fast as some my
> code
> > would need a sparse solver (I proposed that it could be moved in a
> scikit
> > but it makes sense to keep it in scipy so that sparse solvers are
> available
> > in scipy).
>
> Yes, arpack should go into the sparse package.  If you have the time,
> it would be great if you could help get it moved over.  Ideally, we
> can get it moved into scipy.sparse before the 0.7 release around the
> end of March.


I can help, but not before mid-January (I have to live without it because of
some deadlines). Then, I will catch up with what was done.

Matthieu
-- 
French PhD student
Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/
Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20071228/59c3f2fb/attachment.html>