[SciPy-dev] SciPy 0.2.0 tagged in CVS

[Pearu Peterson]

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Travis Oliphant wrote:

> I have tagged the CVS tree as "v0_2_0"
> 
> Now, I'm not sure what to do about the auto-cvs-version business as well 
> as the release_level flag.
> 
> Do, we make source-distributions and binary rpms that have those bits on 
> them as well?
> 
> I think SciPy-0.2.0.tar.gz would be a better file name than what it 
> currently is using sdist command of distutils.
> 
> What do you think?

I agree with you, SciPy-0.2.0.tar.gz looks better, also people who will 
package scipy will be happier.

Hmm, we could start the following convention: when the minor version 
number is odd, then this corresponds to CVS version of scipy. If it is 
even, then to tar-ball version of scipy.
So, scipy_version.py should contain:

if micro % 2:
    scipy_version = '%(major)d.%(minor)d.%(micro)d_%(release_level)s'\
                '_%(cvs_minor)d.%(cvs_serial)d' % (locals ())
else:
    scipy_version = '%(major)d.%(minor)d.%(micro)d' % (locals ())


Pearu