[SciPy-dev] Plot_utlity

eric eric at scipy.org
Tue Feb 19 02:08:25 EST 2002


> I didn't have any problems using the plt module, it works fine.

Sorry.  Confused this with a previous post by a different person about plot
troubles.

> I found
> the module when I was looking for a "autoticker". I have just finished a
> "SVG wrapper" in python and I am trying to test it by creating some
> plots. I used the autoticker for defining the axis.  SVG is the new w3c
> standard for vector graphics. It's a very easy way of creating plots and
> graphics.

This sounds very interesting.  Any chance your code open?  If so, I'd like to
take a look.  Also, what resources did you use to learn about SVG?

thanks,
eric


>
> Fedor
>
>
> >default_bounds may have been intended to be visible outside the module.
> Whether that was ever used, I'm not sure.  Your right though.  The test
> for None is better and much safer.  In this case, it isn't causing any
> problems (besides aesthetics).  The plt module has rarely been accused
> of "elegance."  Hopefully the 2nd cut will make Audry Hepburn envious.
>
> >I haven't seen anything in any of these corrections that would account
> for the problems you were having.  Are they still occuring, or have you
> found the root of the problem?
>
> eric
>
>
> >> 370            def auto_ticks(data_bounds, bounds_info = None):
> >> 371               if bounds_info==None:
> >> 372                  bounds_info = ['auto','auto','auto']
> >>
> >> is a bit more elegant than:
> >>
> >> 369            default_bounds = ['auto','auto','auto']
> >> 370            def auto_ticks(data_bounds, bounds_info =
> >> default_bounds):
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scipy-dev mailing list
> Scipy-dev at scipy.net
> http://www.scipy.net/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>





More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list