Python Trademark Status

[Aahz Maruch]

In article <LNBBLJKPBEHFEDALKOLCOEBPHCAA.tim_one at email.msn.com>,
Tim Peters <tim_one at email.msn.com> wrote:
>[Aahz]
>>
>> I think there may be a legal definition for 'trade' that is used here.
>> My understanding of USA law is that a trademark can be applied for any
>> time a 'product' is involved.
>
>Note that CNRI didn't apply for a trademark, though, they applied for a
>service mark.  If we were lawyers, I bet we'd find that fascinating <wink>.

Ah, yes.  I considered making a passing comment about that in my post,
but I didn't notice that they *had* in fact applied for a service mark.
That makes me *really* itchy.

I sincerely hope that this was simply contingency planning on their
[lawyers'] part, and that through some oversight this hasn't been
canceled yet.
--
                      --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at pobox.com)

Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het    <*>     http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

The difference between "intelligence" and "wisdom": Londo and G'Kar  --Aahz