[python-committers] Anatoly Techtonik's contribution
Jesse Noller
jnoller at gmail.com
Tue Jan 1 23:25:19 CET 2013
On Jan 1, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Brian Curtin <brian at python.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
>>>> On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I say Ezio lets him know that this is the plan since he talked to him
>>>>> recently and is in the no-ban-yet camp.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yesterday I talked to him, informed him about the probation and showed him this
>>>>> message. I hope this is official enough.
>>>>
>>>> So, what was the reaction? That is the important thing to know...
>>>>
>>>
>>> He acknowledged the fact, but I think he had already understood the
>>> issue from our previous conversation.
>>
>> ...and?
>>
>> Does he care about what was said? Is he going to do anything about his
>> actions?
>
> He does, and he is already trying to improve. We already discussed
> about the issue and how to solve it in our previous conversation (see
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2012-December/002307.html),
> so informing him about the probation only served to let him know the
> specific punishment(s) he might face.
>
>> The fact that this discussion sidetracked into contributor
>> agreements is not a good sign to me. He should have just said those
>> things himself to the PSF's legal counsel, not in response to an email
>> about his behavior...
>
> I'm doing this via chat (I think it's better/more effective than
> emails), so sidetracking is not so unexpected (we even ended up
> discussing things that are completely unrelated after we clarified the
> important points). The discussion about the CLA started because he
> said that some of the "accusations" in the thread are not true -- in
> particular that "He flat-out refuses to sign any contributor
> agreement". I asked him why he hasn't signed it and if there was any
> problem with the contributor agreement, and so he replied.
>
So, he still refuses to sign it; or he will sign it?
> Best Regards,
> Ezio Melotti
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
More information about the python-committers
mailing list