[issue8591] update mkpkg to latest coding standards

[Dan Buch]

Dan Buch <daniel.buch at gmail.com> added the comment:

I probably shouldn't have dropped the PEP8 bomb so much as stated that I feel the module could use some updating.  It's my (very much potentially wrong) understanding that `distutils2.mkpkg` isn't considered library code so much as the guts of a script.  

The reason for my concern about `distutils2.mkpkg` goes something like this:

    - it is a new addition to the distutils toolkit
    - if any kind of walkthrough is to be written for using
      distutils, there's a good chance the `mkpkg` script will
      be mentioned
    - curious folks like myself may look at the source code for
      the script
    - said curious folks may either be new to Python or new to
      programming in general
    - I don't want newcomers getting the wrong idea about Python
      coding standards


I should also mention that I have the same concern(s) about everything in the `Demo` tree of CPython :)

Even if `setup.py` files aren't the eventual goal, if they're around for even another 2 years I think the effort is justified. </2cents>

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8591>
_______________________________________