[issue8591] update mkpkg to latest coding standards

[Éric Araujo]

Éric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> added the comment:

Pepeightification is ok for things like whitespace that do not break compatibility (don’t waste time doing it manually though, we have automated tools that can be used to reindent the whole of Distutils2). However, renaming classes and functions has to be done with caution, if there’s code out there that depends on the module. Moreover, PEP 8 does not tell everything, e.g. other PEPs describe good practices for doctrings, and a lot of  idioms are not covered in PEP 8. Distutils2 also has the constraint of having to stay compatible with Python 2.4. Personally, I also find that the name of the script is misleading.

That said, I don’t know the status of mkpkg. If we aim at removing the setup.py script, a utility that helps writing setup.py scripts is doomed to be removed. Or it may be repurposed to write a setup.cfg file.

----------
nosy: +merwok
type: behavior -> 
versions:  -3rd party

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8591>
_______________________________________