[Numpy-discussion] rand argument question
Robert Kern
robert.kern at gmail.com
Fri Jun 2 15:56:46 EDT 2006
Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006, Robert Kern apparently wrote:
>
>>Changing the API of rand() and randn() doesn't solve any
>>problem. Removing them might.
>
> I think this is too blunt an argument. For example,
> use of the old interface might issue a deprecation warning.
> This would make it very likely that all new code use the new
> interface.
My point is that there is no need to change rand() and randn() to the "new"
interface. The "new" interface is already there: random.random() and
random.standard_normal().
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list