[meta-sig] SIG discussing future, Python 2.0

[Gerrit Holl]

<quote name="Jeremy Hylton" date="951995926" email="jeremy@cnri.reston.va.us">
> >>>>> "GH" == Gerrit Holl <gerrit@nl.linux.org> writes:
> 
>   GH> Hello, what about creating a future-sig or a 2.0-sig? Because
>   GH> 2.0 will be incompatible, many things can be changed - do you
>   GH> think it will be meaningful to create a sig for this subject?

...

>   GH> What do you think?

...

> The discussion for this can take place on python-dev.  I don't think
> there's any need for a sig.  Furthermore, the substantial overlap
> between such a sig and python-dev would cause trouble.

I tried to subscribe to python-dev a while ago, but I got the response
that it's on invitation only. It seems that python-dev is a technical
development list. This list does not have to be very technical - no
knowledge about Python's internals is required to discuss on P3K.
</quote>

regards,
Gerrit.

-- 
Plies korekt enie bet ingglisj joe encauntur in mai imil mesusj!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- http://www.geekcode.com
Version: 3.12
GCS dpu s-:-- a14 C++++>$ UL++ P--- L+++ E--- W++ N o? K? w--- !O !M !V PS+ PE?
Y? PGP-- t- 5? X? R- tv- b+(++) DI D+ G++ !e !r !y
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----