[Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

[Slide]

I could write a tool to do that too...screen scraping is actually kind of
fun. My initial plan was just to implement vote and date filters in my
current tool that ports issues over, but closing things is fine with me too.


On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Keith Rome <rome at wintellect.com> wrote:

>   IMO it is fine to lose them. I think codeplex automatically notifies
> you if an issue you opened has been closed (even if it is years later), so
> perhaps just going through and closing all of the < 2 vote or old issues
> with a notice that says "open a new issue on github if this is still
> relevant" would be enough to catch the things that fall through the cracks.
>
>
>   *Keith Rome*
>
> *Principal Architect @ Wintellect (www.wintellect.com
> <http://www.wintellect.com>)*
>
> 770.617.4016 | krome at wintellect.com <rome at wintellect.com>
>
>
>
>
> Register today <https://www.wintellectnow.com/Account/Promo/ROME-13> for
> access to our high-quality on-demand training resources!
>
>
>   From: Jeff Hardy <jdhardy at gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, March 21, 2014 at 9:39 AM
> To: Slide <slide.o.mix at gmail.com>
> Cc: "ironpython-users at python.org" <ironpython-users at python.org>
> Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)
>
>   On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Slide <slide.o.mix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think if you do > 1 vote, you'll miss a lot of issues that are valid, but
> it would provide for a cleaner slate to begin with on GitHub. There are a
> LOT of issues on CodePlex that are leftover from the MS days (internal bug
> tracker migration) that would be really nice to get rid of since we don't
> have the infrastructure to replicate them. I'm up for anything, just need
> to
> update my tool to add date and vote filtering if we decide to go that
> route.
>
>
>  Yeah, we're going to lose some good, actionable issues, but I think
> it's acceptable. The 1000+ issues currently open are just too many to
> do anything useful with. I'm curious to see how many issues we would
> be talking about with the given criteria - around 250 would be good,
> but that's just a gut feeling.
>
>  - Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Ironpython-users mailing list
> Ironpython-users at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users
>
>


-- 
Website: http://earl-of-code.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20140321/daa0ced9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 529A2558-817C-467F-8E7E-0789B90D675C[9].png
Type: image/png
Size: 6285 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20140321/daa0ced9/attachment.png>