[IronPython] NUnit with IronPython

[Stefan Rusek]

Yeah, I wrote a codedom library for ironpython, and had it working with
asp.net and everything only to realized that the dll that IP compiles is
almost useless for asp.net in the current form.

 

--Stefan

 

 

  _____  

From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Keith J. Farmer
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 2:10 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] NUnit with IronPython

 

Having stable names would be useful outside of unit testing, though, and
more attractive in the long run.

 

  _____  

From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com on behalf of Aidan Downes
Sent: Thu 12/8/2005 11:56 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] NUnit with IronPython

Doesn't python have its own nunit variant? Pyunit I think. Probably
easier to port that over to ironpython.

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Keith J. Farmer
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:06 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] NUnit with IronPython

Assuming IP is going for the .NET producer route, what's the tact for
exposing CLR classes with CLR methods?  EG, would there be a 'fixed' (as
in 'non-dynamic') form of method and field which won't mangle the name,
allowing it to be exposed?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 5282 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20051208/e2f47921/attachment.bin>