[IronPython] NUnit with IronPython

Keith J. Farmer kfarmer at thuban.org
Thu Dec 8 21:10:01 CET 2005


Having stable names would be useful outside of unit testing, though, and more attractive in the long run.

________________________________

From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com on behalf of Aidan Downes
Sent: Thu 12/8/2005 11:56 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] NUnit with IronPython



Doesn't python have its own nunit variant? Pyunit I think. Probably
easier to port that over to ironpython.

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Keith J. Farmer
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:06 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] NUnit with IronPython

Assuming IP is going for the .NET producer route, what's the tact for
exposing CLR classes with CLR methods?  EG, would there be a 'fixed' (as
in 'non-dynamic') form of method and field which won't mangle the name,
allowing it to be exposed?



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3955 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20051208/142d35af/attachment.bin>


More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list