[Inpycon] CFP draft for review

[Kenneth Gonsalves]

On Thursday 10 June 2010 17:50:11 Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> did a test
> 
> On Thursday 10 June 2010 17:32:59 Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
> > 1. Duration - Since we accept only 30/45 mins talk, why note make this
> > a drop down with only these 2 choices ?
> 
> yes, needed
> 
> > 2. I had added "Description" in the CFP for detailed outline for
> > reviewers plus notes. It is not possible to review a proposal with just a
> > summary which we say should not be more than 100 words. This is required
> > in the interface.
> > 3. Can we have a "topic" category which lists the main topics I have
> > in the CFP which the user can select then ?
> 
> again needed
> 
> > 4. Does it make sense to generate a unique ID for a talk that is
> > submitted ?
> 
> there is no verification of the email address submitted - I put an invalid
>  one and it was accepted. Also I wonder if there is any protection against
>  bots submitting talks - we *do* have people around who enjoy exposing such
>  vulnerabilities ;-)
> 
> and I just submitted a blank form - that went through also. Apparently
>  there is no verification set up so far.
> 

and one more thing - author profile is needed - who he is, his affiliation and 
qualifications/experience, background etc
-- 
Regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Senior Associate
NRC-FOSS at AU-KBC