[DB-SIG] DCOracle + DCOracle2
Lane, George
geolane@sunesis.com
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:05:58 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1F09B.9698DCC2
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C1F09B.9698DCC2";
type="multipart/alternative"
------_=_NextPart_002_01C1F09B.9698DCC2
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_003_01C1F09B.9698DCC2"
------_=_NextPart_003_01C1F09B.9698DCC2
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We have DCOracle installed on a Solaris machine running Oracle 8.1.6. =
Has anyone tried installing DCOracle2 in addition to DCOracle? Any =
problems or issues with coexistence?
=20
>From an application standpoint, the biggest changes seem to be returning =
list of lists using fetchxxx(rather than a list of tuples), and the =
executemany statement discussed in the docs (which we hadn't been =
using). =20
=20
The longer process is redoing the applications which currently rely on =
DCOracle... =20
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-=20
=20
------_=_NextPart_003_01C1F09B.9698DCC2
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<TITLE>Blank</TITLE>
<STYLE>BODY {
MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; =
FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; =
FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
LI.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; =
FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
</STYLE>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY background=3Dcid:774565922@30042002-161c>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D774565922-30042002>We have DCOracle installed on a =
Solaris=20
machine running Oracle 8.1.6. Has anyone tried installing =
DCOracle2 in=20
addition to DCOracle? Any problems or issues with=20
coexistence?</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D774565922-30042002></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D774565922-30042002>From an application standpoint, =
the biggest=20
changes seem to be returning list of lists using fetchxxx(rather than a =
list of=20
tuples), and the executemany statement discussed in the docs (which we =
hadn't=20
been using). </SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D774565922-30042002></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D774565922-30042002>The longer process is redoing the=20
applications which currently rely on DCOracle... </SPAN></DIV>
<P><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-</FONT> =
</P>
<P> </P></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_003_01C1F09B.9698DCC2--
------_=_NextPart_002_01C1F09B.9698DCC2
Content-Type: image/gif;
name="Blank Bkgrd.gif"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: <774565922@30042002-161c>
Content-Description: Blank Bkgrd.gif
Content-Location: Blank%20Bkgrd.gif
R0lGODlhLQAtAID/AP////f39ywAAAAALQAtAEACcAxup8vtvxKQsFon6d02898pGkgiYoCm6sq2
7iqWcmzOsmeXeA7uPJd5CYdD2g9oPF58ygqz+XhCG9JpJGmlYrPXGlfr/Yo/VW45e7amp2tou/lW
xo/zX513z+Vt+1n/tiX2pxP4NUhy2FM4xtjIUQAAOw==
------_=_NextPart_002_01C1F09B.9698DCC2--
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1F09B.9698DCC2
Content-Type: text/x-vcard;
name="George Lane (E-mail).vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: George Lane (E-mail).vcf
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="George Lane (E-mail).vcf"
QkVHSU46VkNBUkQNClZFUlNJT046Mi4xDQpOOkxhbmU7R2VvcmdlDQpGTjpMYW5lLCBHZW9yZ2UN
ClRFTDtXT1JLO1ZPSUNFOjY1MC0yNjYtMzY3NA0KQURSO1dPUks6OzszNDEgT3lzdGVyIFBvaW50
IEJsdmQuO1NvdXRoIFNhbiBGcmFuY2lzY287Q0E7OTQwODANCkxBQkVMO1dPUks7RU5DT0RJTkc9
UVVPVEVELVBSSU5UQUJMRTozNDEgT3lzdGVyIFBvaW50IEJsdmQuPTBEPTBBU291dGggU2FuIEZy
YW5jaXNjbywgQ0EgOTQwODANCkVNQUlMO1BSRUY7SU5URVJORVQ6Z2VvbGFuZUBzdW5lc2lzLmNv
bQ0KUkVWOjIwMDEwODIyVDE5NDQyMVoNCkVORDpWQ0FSRA0K
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1F09B.9698DCC2--