[C++-sig] Memory corruption in exception translation on OS X 10.7

Niall Douglas s_sourceforge at nedprod.com
Thu Oct 27 13:32:07 CEST 2011


OS X 10.6 and later have a very aggressive memory allocator in them - 
it is superbly quick, but it's still quite young code.

If your BPL example runs under valgrind on Linux fine - and I would 
suspect that it does - it'll be a bug in either OS X or Apple's port 
of GCC to OS X (which would hardly be the first time).

If it does trip on valgrind on Linux you'll get a much more 
enthusiastic response here.

Niall


On 26 Oct 2011 at 21:38, Jakob van Santen wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I've run across what I think is a strange memory corruption bug affecting C++/Python exception translation on OS X 10.7. A short program that reproduces the bug follows:
> 
> #include <boost/python.hpp>
> 
> static void
> throwme() { throw std::invalid_argument("Bork!"); }
> 
> struct Bork {
>         void throwy() { throwme(); }
> };
> 
> #ifdef BORKED
> BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(borked)
> {
>         boost::python::class_<Bork>("Bork")
>             .def("throwy", &Bork::throwy)
>         ;
> #else
> BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(good)
> {
> #endif
>         boost::python::def("throwy", &throwme);
> }
> 
> When compiled without the call to class_<Bork>::def(), the exception is caught in handle_exception_impl() and presented to Python as ValueError, as expected:
> 
> [jakob at i3-dhcp-172-16-55-176:tmp/pybork]$ python -c "import good; good.throwy()"
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
> ValueError: Bork!
> 
> When compiled with -DBORKED, however, I get a bad free() inside the std::logic_error destructor:
> 
> [jakob at i3-dhcp-172-16-55-176:tmp/pybork]$ python -c "import borked; borked.throwy()"
> python(77633) malloc: *** error for object 0x7fec22c735a4: pointer being freed was not allocated
> *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
> 
> I first encountered this bug in a private fork of 1.38, but I can reproduce it with a freshly build copy of 1.47. It occurs when building with both llvm-gcc and gcc-gcc, regardless of the optimization level. I built the two test libraries like so:
> 
> g++ bork.cxx -g -bundle -flat_namespace -undefined dynamic_lookup -Iboost/include -I/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Headers/ -Lboost/lib -lboost_python -DBORKED -o borked.so
> g++ bork.cxx -g -bundle -flat_namespace -undefined dynamic_lookup -Iboost/include -I/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Headers/ -Lboost/lib -lboost_python -o good.so
> 
> Can anyone reproduce this?
> 
> Cheers,
> Jakob
> _______________________________________________
> Cplusplus-sig mailing list
> Cplusplus-sig at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig


-- 
Technology & Consulting Services - ned Productions Limited.
http://www.nedproductions.biz/. VAT reg: IE 9708311Q. Company no: 
472909.





More information about the Cplusplus-sig mailing list