[C++-sig] Re: Re: Re: Compile failure with object in V2

[David Abrahams]

Check the CVS and see for yourself ;-)

BTW, shall I give you CVS access? I think it would be much better if you
were making incremental progress on the CVS state than if you save
everything and dump a big patch on me later...

-Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hawkes" <daveh at cadlink.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.c++
To: <c++-sig at python.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 12:30 PM
Subject: [C++-sig] Re: Re: Re: Compile failure with object in V2


>
> "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams at rcn.com> wrote in message
> news:1db401c22b53$42a03230$6601a8c0 at boostconsulting.com...
> >
> >
> > It seems like a fine patch; I'm checking it in!
> > BTW, I notice you slipped in the default None constructor; I'm adding
that
> > also.
> >
> I forgot that was there...
> I assume you guessed the missing part:
>
> inline object::object()
>     : object_base(incref(Py_None))
> {}
>
> Dave Hawkes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> C++-sig mailing list
> C++-sig at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig
>