[core-workflow] GitHub migration update for 2016-12-19

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Thu Dec 22 22:45:22 EST 2016


My assumption has been that when we close hg.p.o -- which is a ways off --
that the repo would move to Bitbucket.

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016, 19:13 Ezio Melotti, <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:49:03 +0000
> > Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> >> The biggest update is I have updated the code for hg.python.org/lookup.
> >> Once the hg repo is read-only I will generate a final JSON file
> containing
> >> every commit and then have the new code and data uploaded. If you want
> to
> >> look at the modified code and double-check my work then please look at
> >> https://gist.github.com/brettcannon/f8d97c92b0df264cd4db008ffd32daf9.
> >
> > I thought you were going to redirect hg changeset references to github,
> > so that we don't have to maintain hg.p.o indefinitely.
> >
>
> The Roundup that we are using on b.p.o[0] is a clone of upstream
> Roundup[1] with our additional changes[2] in a separate branch.
>
> There are 4 things that could happen to this repo:
>   1. keep hg.p.o alive and nothing changes;
>   2. move it somewhere else (e.g. BitBucket -- does GitHub support HG
> repos?);
>   3. convert it to Git and move it to GitHub with the others;
>   4. get rid of our branch and use a regular Roundup;
>
> As long as we keep it on HG (whether on hg.p.o or BitBucket), updating
> it is a matter of a pull/merge/push.  If we port it to Git, updating
> will become less straightforward, but probably still doable.  Getting
> rid of our branch means reviewing and porting upstream our changes,
> then wait for the next official Roundup release and use that.  Note
> that some of the upcoming changes we are working on while integrating
> b.p.o with GitHub also affect Roundup, so they will make our branch
> diverge further.
>
> The instances (b.p.o, the meta-tracker, and the others) could
> technically be converted to Git, but I would rather keep them together
> with our Roundup clone.
>
> Best Regards,
> Ezio Melotti
>
> [0]: https://hg.python.org/tracker/roundup/
> [1]: http://hg.code.sf.net/p/roundup/code
> [2]: more on the differences in this thread:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/roundup/mailman/message/30752855/
>
> > Ditto for SVN revision references (which currently are redirected to
> > hg.p.o, not svn.p.o).
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > core-workflow mailing list
> > core-workflow at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
> > This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
> https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
> _______________________________________________
> core-workflow mailing list
> core-workflow at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
> This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
> https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20161223/3f58e5a7/attachment.html>


More information about the core-workflow mailing list