[Chicago] Coverage.py
Matt Dorn
matt.dorn at gmail.com
Fri Mar 22 17:17:45 CET 2013
We've got it working nicely with nosetests and Jenkins via the
"Cobertura" plugin -- I recall being guided by this blog post:
http://www.alexconrad.org/2011/10/jenkins-and-python.html
On 3/22/13 10:19 AM, Daniel Griffin wrote:
> It's simple and we have it integrated with Buildbot. It works fine,
> having tests and test coverage doesnt guarantee that you have good code.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, John Jacobsen <john at mail.npxdesigns.com
> <mailto:john at mail.npxdesigns.com>> wrote:
>
> I have used it as part of nosetests (--with-coverage option). With
> that usage, at least, you get not only a module-by-module report of
> your code coverage but also a browsable HTML tree which shows
> "green" and "red" spots which are / aren't covered by test,
> respectively. Very nice.
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Brian Ray wrote:
>
>> Someone asked me off the list about
>> Coverage.py https://pypi.python.org/pypi/coverage/
>>
>> Does anyone have any experience with this? Any recommendations or
>> thoughts?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brian Ray
>> @brianray
>> (773) 669-7717 <tel:%28773%29%20669-7717>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago mailing list
>> Chicago at python.org <mailto:Chicago at python.org>
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org <mailto:Chicago at python.org>
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
More information about the Chicago
mailing list