[Chicago] Coverage.py

Matt Dorn matt.dorn at gmail.com
Fri Mar 22 17:17:45 CET 2013


We've got it working nicely with nosetests and Jenkins via the
"Cobertura" plugin -- I recall being guided by this blog post:

http://www.alexconrad.org/2011/10/jenkins-and-python.html


On 3/22/13 10:19 AM, Daniel Griffin wrote:
> It's simple and we have it integrated with Buildbot. It works fine,
> having tests and test coverage doesnt guarantee that you have good code.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, John Jacobsen <john at mail.npxdesigns.com
> <mailto:john at mail.npxdesigns.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I have used it as part of nosetests (--with-coverage option).  With
>     that usage, at least, you get not only a module-by-module report of
>     your code coverage but also a browsable HTML tree which shows
>     "green" and "red" spots which are / aren't covered by test,
>     respectively.  Very nice.
> 
> 
>     On Mar 22, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Brian Ray wrote:
> 
>>     Someone asked me off the list about
>>     Coverage.py https://pypi.python.org/pypi/coverage/
>>
>>     Does anyone have any experience with this? Any recommendations or
>>     thoughts?
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Brian Ray 
>>     @brianray
>>     (773) 669-7717 <tel:%28773%29%20669-7717>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Chicago mailing list
>>     Chicago at python.org <mailto:Chicago at python.org>
>>     http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Chicago mailing list
>     Chicago at python.org <mailto:Chicago at python.org>
>     http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> 



More information about the Chicago mailing list