[Chicago] Coverage.py

[Daniel Griffin]

It's simple and we have it integrated with Buildbot. It works fine, having
tests and test coverage doesnt guarantee that you have good code.


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, John Jacobsen <john at mail.npxdesigns.com>wrote:

> I have used it as part of nosetests (--with-coverage option).  With that
> usage, at least, you get not only a module-by-module report of your code
> coverage but also a browsable HTML tree which shows "green" and "red" spots
> which are / aren't covered by test, respectively.  Very nice.
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Brian Ray wrote:
>
> Someone asked me off the list about Coverage.py
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/coverage/
>
> Does anyone have any experience with this? Any recommendations or thoughts?
>
>
> --
> Brian Ray
> @brianray
> (773) 669-7717
>  _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20130322/ed99004e/attachment.html>