[Chicago] jan video

[Adam Jenkins]

I have no problem with the group paying for some nice videos. I just didn't
think you actually wanted the question answered in a number amount when you
asked. I thought the purpose of the email was to say you wouldn't be there
and we needed to figure something out.

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:26 PM, sheila miguez <shekay at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Adam Jenkins <emperorcezar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Carl Karsten <carl at personnelware.com
> > wrote:
> >
> >> So the value of chipy videos is 0?
> >>
> >> I am hoping that's not what ya'll are saying, but that's all that has
> >> been posted.
> >
> >
> > How much is the value of the slides? Because someone can't come up with a
> > number doesn't mean it's zero.
>
> Slides out of context aren't that valuable. Particularly for chipy,
> where the most valuable parts of the presentations aren't contained in
> slides.
>
> > Because the videos aren't sold, and chipy is free, it's very difficult to
> > answer your question. Even an economics professor would have difficulty
> > doing so.
>
> I think an economics prof could come up with something pretty easily
> by considering the time, labor, and cost of materials used. We could
> probably come up with a guestimate for opportunity cost.
>
> > Also, a smart-ass reply. Q: How much are they worth? A: Exactly what
> people
> > will pay.
>
> Carl and I are paying to record everything. I am less motivated than he is.
>
> --
> sheila
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20120108/8df9b11b/attachment.html>