[Chicago] Gently off topic: independent contractors andcontracts

[Massimo Di Pierro]

I wrote my own. I could expand to include the body but it will need  
some work. Give me a few weeks.

On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:

> Cool stuff! Can you expand the indexing to include the body of a  
> post, in
> addition to the title?
>
> Also curious, are you using a library for the search/indexing or  
> did you
> roll your own?
>
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:21 PM, chicago-bounces at python.org  
> wrote:
>
>> Here you go. Start posting!
>>
>> https://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/LegalTemplates
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Milan Andric wrote:
>>
>>> Also known as legal templates.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Massimo Di Pierro
>>> <mdipierro at cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>>>> Not if they are completely anonimized (no reference to the parties
>>>> involved).
>>>>
>>>>  Massimo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Feb 26, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Interesting idea. Ironically, there might be some legal issues in
>>>>> creating a site that stores confidential information like pending
>>>>> contracts, etc. Hmmm.
>>>>>
>>>>> On , chicago-bounces+garrett=mojave-corp.com at python.org wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What about building  web site where people can post and download
>>>>>> existing contracts (anonimized, categorized, and commented) to
>>>>>> find out what they need. I can create the web site tomorrow if
>>>>>> people have something to post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Massimo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 25, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have this friend. He's smart (so you know I'm not really
>>>>>>> talking about myself) and a lawyer. In the past he's helped me
>>>>>>> sort out some issues with sundry contract issues related to
>>>>>>> software development.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Question to any independent software developers on the list: Do
>>>>>>> you ever find yourself wanting a legal review of a software
>>>>>>> contract to make sure you're not missing anything important?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you're anything like me, you're a cheap bastard (okay, "cost
>>>>>>> conscious") and don't want to engage a full fledged firm because
>>>>>>> you suspect they'll over charge you for what should be a simple
>>>>>>> and reasonably priced service. All you really need is perhaps a
>>>>>>> $200-$300 review by a competent tech attorney to make sure  
>>>>>>> you've
>>>>>>> got your bases covered in the agreement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone been in that position before? Thoughts on a simple,
>>>>>>> fixed- fee price for such services?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Garrett
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Chicago mailing list
>>>>>>> Chicago at python.org
>>>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Chicago mailing list
>>>>>> Chicago at python.org
>>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Chicago mailing list
>>>>> Chicago at python.org
>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  Chicago mailing list
>>>>  Chicago at python.org
>>>>  http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Milan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chicago mailing list
>>> Chicago at python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago mailing list
>> Chicago at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago