[Chicago] Gently off topic: independent contractors andcontracts

Garrett Smith garrett at mojave-corp.com
Wed Feb 27 21:56:13 CET 2008


Cool stuff! Can you expand the indexing to include the body of a post, in
addition to the title?

Also curious, are you using a library for the search/indexing or did you
roll your own?

On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:21 PM, chicago-bounces at python.org wrote:

> Here you go. Start posting!
> 
> https://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/LegalTemplates
> 
> On Feb 26, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Milan Andric wrote:
> 
>> Also known as legal templates.
>> 
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Massimo Di Pierro
>> <mdipierro at cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>>> Not if they are completely anonimized (no reference to the parties 
>>> involved). 
>>> 
>>>  Massimo
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  On Feb 26, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Interesting idea. Ironically, there might be some legal issues in
>>>> creating a site that stores confidential information like pending
>>>> contracts, etc. Hmmm.
>>>> 
>>>> On , chicago-bounces+garrett=mojave-corp.com at python.org wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> What about building  web site where people can post and download
>>>>> existing contracts (anonimized, categorized, and commented) to
>>>>> find out what they need. I can create the web site tomorrow if
>>>>> people have something to post.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Massimo
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 25, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have this friend. He's smart (so you know I'm not really
>>>>>> talking about myself) and a lawyer. In the past he's helped me
>>>>>> sort out some issues with sundry contract issues related to
>>>>>> software development. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Question to any independent software developers on the list: Do
>>>>>> you ever find yourself wanting a legal review of a software
>>>>>> contract to make sure you're not missing anything important?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you're anything like me, you're a cheap bastard (okay, "cost
>>>>>> conscious") and don't want to engage a full fledged firm because
>>>>>> you suspect they'll over charge you for what should be a simple
>>>>>> and reasonably priced service. All you really need is perhaps a
>>>>>> $200-$300 review by a competent tech attorney to make sure you've
>>>>>> got your bases covered in the agreement.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anyone been in that position before? Thoughts on a simple,
>>>>>> fixed- fee price for such services? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Garrett
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Chicago mailing list
>>>>>> Chicago at python.org
>>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Chicago mailing list
>>>>> Chicago at python.org
>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chicago mailing list
>>>> Chicago at python.org
>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>> 
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Chicago mailing list
>>>  Chicago at python.org
>>>  http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Milan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago mailing list
>> Chicago at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago



More information about the Chicago mailing list