[XML-SIG] PyXML 0.7 & 4XSLT

Daniel Veillard veillard@redhat.com
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 05:04:07 -0400


On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:26:42PM -0600, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:48:20PM -0400, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> > > PyXML, where it will be maintained, but in the meanwhile, we don't
> > > really seem to have a good XSLT strategy.
> > 
> >   Have you thought about integrating libxslt + its existing wrappers ?
> > Speed wise and conformance wise, I think your user base would be happy.
> 
> Ah, good.  You have particular performance bugs to report in 4Suite, then, 
> right?

  No. Look carefully at my mail I did not specifically say anything about
4XSLT and removed any related context in my reply.
  The performance race I have run in the last year is with MSXML4 which
until recently was considered the faster general purpose XSLT implementation.
The goal is to provide free software tools with at least similar performances
as those available from our beloved monopolist,

  yours,

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/