[XML-SIG] The '_' thingy
Uche Ogbuji
uogbuji@fourthought.com
Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:06:00 -0600
> Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> >
> > > Mike Olson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So, I think I see this as a general concensius:
> > >
> > > Are you kidding?
> > >
> > > > 1. DOM will never (in forseeable future) be used over an ORB, so the
> > > > IDL should be used as a guide.
> > >
> > > Uh, this doesn't make sense.
> >
> > Please elaborate.
>
> Mike says that DOM won't be used over an ORB and yet
> he says that (CORBA) IDL idle *should* be used as a guide.
> If we don't care about CORBA, why be guided by UDL?
I think you mis-read him. I think by "guide", he means that the IDL should be
a guiding formalism, not that the API must cooincide with what you get when
you compile the IDL. I thought we'd all got on the same side of this.
> > > > We should focus more on useability then
> > > > CORBA compliance.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Most people will access the DOM via attributes.
> > >
> > > Who says? What do you have to support this? Most people
> > > will access the DOM through whatever interface we define.
> >
> > Mike's support is that back when this SIG agreed upon attribute access as well
> > as _get/_set ops, most people said they'd prefer to just use plain attribute
> > access anyway, and the _get/_set was only needed for completeness.
> >
> > Do you have any support to contradict his assertion?
>
> In the discussion over the last few days, I've seen alot of confusion
> over what the Python DOM API actually is. It's hard to believe that
> real consensus exists in such an environment.
If I understand how strict you're setting up the conditions for "real
consensus" to be, I hardly thing there is any area of Python development (or
of development in general) where you'll find real consensus.
--
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com +01 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python