[XML-SIG] DOM and Proxies
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
fdrake@acm.org
Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:26:31 -0500 (EST)
Paul Prescod writes:
> Insofar as this is minidom and provides minimal support for moving
> things around, cloning them and so forth, I wouldn't put in proxies just
> to get object reuse. In the full PyDOM they would be more appropriate.
I was thinking more of the general case, DOM or otherwise. I think
it would be really nice to have this sort of proxy available in a
"high performance" implementation. The reality is that several
variants might be needed (with various support for mappings,
sequences, etc.), but that's a detail symptomatic of the type/class
dichotomy and not a long-term issue. It may not be realistic to share
one implementation, and may not be worth the C code if not.
But to support "sharable sub-hierarchies" as Ken described, we would
need to use some sort of proxy solution.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives