[Web-SIG] WSGI in standard library

[Guido van Rossum]

On 2/16/06, Alan Kennedy <pywebsig at alan.kennedy.name> wrote:
> [Ian Bicking]
> > Anyway, I'm +1 on the object [wsgiref's wsgi header manipulation class]
> > going somewhere.  I don't know if the
> > parent package has to be named "wsgi" -- and "wsgiref" seems even
> > stranger to me, as anything in the standard library isn't a "reference
> > implementation" anymore, but an actual implementation.  I personally
> > like a package name like "web".  Everyone will know what that means
> > (though it would start with most of the web related modules not in it,
> > which is a problem).
>
> While we're on the subject, can we find a better home for the HTTP
> status codes->messages mapping?
>
> Integer status codes.
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/2004-September/000764.html
>
> Adding status code constants to httplib
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/2004-September/000842.html

+1. Feel free to submit a patch to SF and assign it to me.

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)