[Pythonmac-SIG] Problems with pimp in 2.3.4

[Jack Jansen]

On 6 Jul 2004, at 23:14, Bob Ippolito wrote:

>>> I just tried the GUI Package manager and pimp.py and both seem as 
>>> they would work now. Before I go on, please allow one further 
>>> question: is it possible to install the listed binary packages into 
>>> any Python 2.3.x version (binary compatibility)?
>>
>> That is definitely the intention of Python micro-releases, so if this 
>> isn't the case please let me know.
>
> But it isn't necessarily the case.  Each .so will have a mach-o load 
> command pointing to some particular Python path, except when using the 
> -undefined dynamic_lookup linker flag on 10.3.  Has that linking style 
> been backported to any 2.3.x release?

Bob is right: I forgot about the pathname issue.
--
Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen at cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma 
Goldman