[Pythonmac-SIG] Packaging all toolbox modules in a package
Just van Rossum
just@letterror.com
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:56:04 +0200
Jack Jansen wrote:
> And will it bother OS9 users that they have to say Carbon.Evt even if they're
> using classic PPC Python?
>
> It wouldn't bother me, but I'm just asking...
Dunno: I think that at least with MacPython (as in CFM-based) the default might
have to remain unpackaged for a while?
Even more major: how about :Mac:Lib and other assorted modules? A package named
"Mac"?
[ ... ]
> No problem anymore: because I had to fix this for OSX (the
> WITH_MAC_TOOLBOX_GLUE stuff) we can now put all toolbox modules in their own
> ..slb.
Cool.
> The only issue I can see is that I don't know whether it's possible to do the
> install automatically for OSX unix-Python builds. But that is a minor issue,
> it might even be a good idea to do the whole toolbox stuff as a separate
> distutils-based "distribution" (included in the standard distribution).
Make under unix already runs a setup.py, so we could perhaps add a "darwin1"
switch in it?
Btw: since Waste is carbonized, could it be available under Unix, too?
Just