[Pythonmac-SIG] Packaging all toolbox modules in a package

Just van Rossum just@letterror.com
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:56:04 +0200


Jack Jansen wrote:

> And will it bother OS9 users that they have to say Carbon.Evt even if they're 
> using classic PPC Python?
> 
> It wouldn't bother me, but I'm just asking...

Dunno: I think that at least with MacPython (as in CFM-based) the default might
have to remain unpackaged for a while?

Even more major: how about :Mac:Lib and other assorted modules? A package named
"Mac"?

[ ... ]
> No problem anymore: because I had to fix this for OSX (the 
> WITH_MAC_TOOLBOX_GLUE stuff) we can now put all toolbox modules in their own 
> ..slb.

Cool.

> The only issue I can see is that I don't know whether it's possible to do the 
> install automatically for OSX unix-Python builds. But that is a minor issue, 
> it might even be a good idea to do the whole toolbox stuff as a separate 
> distutils-based "distribution" (included in the standard distribution).

Make under unix already runs a setup.py, so we could perhaps add a "darwin1"
switch in it?

Btw: since Waste is carbonized, could it be available under Unix, too?

Just