[Python-mode] simplified procedure

[Barry Warsaw]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Jan 11, 2011, at 07:40 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Am 11.01.2011 16:20, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
>> Sure.  I think it's fine to JFDI for trivial patches.  After all, we have a
>> version control system and post-commit notifications with diffs.  I don't
>> think you even need to do a merge proposal for those.
>
>I agree -- in fact that's what I've been doing all the time except for the
>new font-lock faces.

Me too.

>> Yep, behavior changes should require a higher barrier.  A discussion on this
>> mailing list would always be good (before, during, or after merge proposal is
>> submitted).
>
>Not sure if you and Andreas agree what a "fundamental change" or "behavior
>change" is.

Oh that's easy.  If it would confuse me or Guido, it counts. :)

- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=x1ne
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----