New Python implementation
Paul Bryan
pbryan at anode.ca
Thu Feb 11 13:24:27 EST 2021
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 17:56 +0000, Mr Flibble wrote:
> Actually it is a relatively small task due to the neos universal
> compiler's architectural design. If it was a large task I wouldn't
> be doing it.
When do you estimate this task will be completed?
> I am not particularly interested in any of the existing
> implementations as they bear no relation to the design of my language
> agnostic universal compiler, runtime, VM and JIT; the only use they
> will have will be to disambiguate certain Python language constructs
> that I cannot disambiguate from documentation alone: this is a
> natural consequence of Python not being standardized; those steering
> the language need to grow a pair and get Python standardized
> preferably as an ISO Standard.
I take it you don't hope to receive any support from those you're
insulting by such a statement?
> Thanks for the sentiment but I am not relying on luck.
By your conduct so far, I think you will also not be relying on the
goodwill of this community.
Paul
More information about the Python-list
mailing list