New Python implementation

Paul Bryan pbryan at anode.ca
Thu Feb 11 13:24:27 EST 2021


On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 17:56 +0000, Mr Flibble wrote:

> Actually it is a relatively small task due to the neos universal
> compiler's architectural design.  If it was a large task I wouldn't
> be doing it.

When do you estimate this task will be completed?

> I am not particularly interested in any of the existing
> implementations as they bear no relation to the design of my language
> agnostic universal compiler, runtime, VM and JIT; the only use they
> will have will be to disambiguate certain Python language constructs
> that I cannot disambiguate from documentation alone: this is a
> natural consequence of Python not being standardized; those steering
> the language need to grow a pair and get Python standardized
> preferably as an ISO Standard.

I take it you don't hope to receive any support from those you're
insulting by such a statement?

> Thanks for the sentiment but I am not relying on luck.

By your conduct so far, I think you will also not be relying on the
goodwill of this community.

Paul



More information about the Python-list mailing list