Using Python 2

[Rick Johnson]

On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 10:42:44 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:

> To be perfectly rational, we *should* consider at least
> three alternatives:
> 
> (1) Stick with Python 2 and pay for support;
> 
> (2) Migrate to Python 3;
> 
> (3) Re-implement in some other language;
> 
> and make a dispassionate choice according to which one has
> the best cost/benefit ratio. And that choice won't always
> be #2.

Finally! A reasonable response.