the global keyword:

[Antoon Pardon]

Op 21-06-16 om 12:41 schreef BartC:
> On 21/06/2016 09:08, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 20-06-16 om 16:53 schreef Steven D'Aprano:
>
>>> You know, there's not actually a rule or law that says you have to
>>> automatically take the contrary position to everything I say.
>>
>> There is also not a rule of law that says you have to automatically
>> introduce
>> semantic games into the discussion when someone else might have a point.
>
> Glancing at the ducks limp thread again (starting 3-Jun-2016), it
> seems it was you trying to persuade me that (1) the name references
> I'd implemented (and which allowed me to do extra things that Python
> couldn't) weren't name references at all; (2) that Python really did
> have name references when you tried hard enough to emulate them.
>
> What sort of semantic games were those then?

If you can't stop yourself from raking that thread up again.
Do it in the thread itself. If you do, could you start with
pointing out where I write about "name references". I don't
recall having used that.

-- 
Antoon Pardon.