Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions

[Ian Kelly]

On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro
<lawrencedo99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, July 4, 2016 at 12:02:23 PM UTC+12, Ian wrote:
>> I'm talking about the docstring of the *decorator*, not func.
>
> *Sigh*. Originally somebody was complaining that the lambda version didn’t allow for good (or any) docstrings. So I posted my version, and I went to all the effort of ensuring that every generated function had a good docstring. And now you are trying to knock me down for that?
>
> What the hell is wrong with you people?!?

Sorry. I don't know who that was or what they wrote, because your post
is the first mention of docstrings that I see in this thread. Maybe
you're thinking of some other thread. I don't read more than a
fraction of what gets posted to this list.

But I read your post and I saw a way to improve the code in it, so I
suggested it. Next time I won't bother.